Along side the viewing , I got a personal interview with Mr Paul Wells who helped me elaborate further the different genres of animation ( which ties in with my current Context of practice essay). Its really interesting to hear from the author whose work had played such a major role in my studies, and even more interesting to hear he confessed that he would like to re-write his works in more simpler and easy-to -understand term, but that wouldn't sit well with the publisher. He helped me with my main request of explaining what the formal genre of animation is , with an answer that is short , straight-forward and very comprehensible : it is when animation ask the question " what is it that animation can do , that live action can not", such as telling a fairy tale, animation can bring in magic , can animate talking animals, that is something that real life can't . Its qualities like those that forms the bases of the formal genre. Without a doubt , having a clearer image of this would significantly improve my understanding and is yet another source of reference for my current and future essays.
And with that , I have to get to the main part of the they , the preview of "The Red turtle". With staff members for Studio Ghibli essentially kickstarting and participating in it , including art directer Isao Takahata, that reason alone was enough to draw me in , and I was not disappointed with it. But safe to say ,credit is where credit's due, the staff of studio Canal and all the other French and Belgian studios did an amzing job , created a beautiful piece of work, perhaps not reaching the level of details of Ghibli yet but nonetheless quite an achievement. Director Michael Dudok de Wit had shown such dedication to his craft by producing much of the storyboard by himself, close the ways of Miyazaki. As an animated feature with no dialog , The Red turtle truely relies on the visual aspect of animation to deliver its emotions , and it indeed succeed in this aspect. The colours used on the background are composed perfectly so that it would fit the emotional state of the scene and of the character, while still retain a sense of realism and natural quality , such as , the use of blue and black during stages of sadness, lost or despair, or the use of the raging red hues of sunset to emphasise anger in the character. Speaking of which , the production team has done so much in bringing out the humanity and character of the backgrounds. Most of the time , we see nature takes the center stage of the scenes ( where most compositions have the casts really small compared to the scenery around them). This create a true sense of scale and push the fact the the main character is truly lost to the vastness of nature. But not only that , we see nature playing the role of a character , interacting with the cast ( the bloody crabs ) and even becoming the antagonist in the final stages of the movie (the tsunami). At the begining of the movie , there is a short clip of director de Wit talking about the inspiration for this movie , among it is his fascination with nature and the tale of Robinson Crusoe. He didn't want a situation like in Robinson , where man dominates nature and its hardship , but instead focuses on the power and beauty of nature , where man relies on and are driven by it. Of course , I'm not saying that I fully understand the meaning he's trying to convey through the plot of the movie ( the having a fictional relationship with a turtle part really went over my head ) , but what he has succeeded in is telling an interesting story and conveying emotion effectively. Once again, this is thanks to the hard work of the animation team, creating such fluid and human-like motions that is subtle yet really relatable to our real-life self ( throwing a rock out of frustration or cuddling behind your love ones ) .
Proper thumbs up to them , to Michael and to Ghibli for kickstarting such an amazing project.
No comments:
Post a Comment